Thanks for @Myrle, @Jan, @Dan, @Willem and everyone else who has make effort on this topic.
Weex-Loader [1] and Weex-CLI [2] is a part of Apache Weex now. The problem is solved, finally. [1] https://github.com/apache/weex-loader [2] https://github.com/apache/weex-cli Best Regards, YorkShen 申远 Myrle Krantz <[email protected]> 于2019年3月9日周六 下午6:54写道： > Going back through my mails, I realized I failed to answer one of your > questions. My apologies. > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 9:24 AM 申远 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 1. If the corresponding code is owned by Alibaba, and someone represented > > the company would sign the SGA, is there any necessary to have all the > > contributors signed the SGA again? > > > > I believe that would be sufficient, but you should ask the legal > committee. (See below.) > > 2. From my point of view, there will be lots of copyright / trademark > > issues around, as none of the PPMC member is lawyer, Is there anyone from > > Apache we can consult about the law issue? > > > > There is! This is one of the services ASF provides for its projects. You > can email [email protected] or, if it's something that needs to be > kept private [email protected]. You may prefer to submit a JIRA > ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LEGAL) You can get more > information here: https://www.apache.org/legal/ > > > > 3. weex-toolkit is already an open source project under MIT license, > would > > it violate any copyright / trademark rules/laws if we fork the original > > weex-toolkit and push it to Apache repos. > > > > I believe it would be allowed, because the MIT license is a category A > license. But I suggest you ask someone with more legal know-how (see > above). It may not accomplish your purposes unless you convince the > developers there to start doing their work here. If they were to continue > working over there, it would be problematic because the Weex PMC wouldn't > be able to participate in decisions about who commits or what they commit. > > Best Regards, > Myrle >
