On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > > The following URL: > > https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Ignite > > > > ... does not show their October report. I presume that is because the > > October minutes had not been approved and/or Whimsy only looks at > > board/archived_agendas. Fair enough. > > Not that it matters, but what Whimsy looks at is is the published > minutes on the site itself > ( > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/foundation/records/minutes > ), > Yup. Makes sense, and I suspected something like that. Thanks for the edu. > > What I ran into just now is using the above URL, and (mistakenly) > > concluding that they did not file an October report. > > > > Would it be possible to crawl $(InfoSource) and add a note to the above > > page saying something like "Report was filed. Waiting on approval of > > minutes.", or somesuch. ?? > > I've got the code and I was ready to commit it, when it occurred to me > that in recent history we had a case where the title of a special > order was later redacted prior to publishing. Since that doesn't seem > To clarify: I asked about report filing. And a statement saying "report was filed" is quite anonymized/generic. I agree that Special Orders are *very* different. Even listing their title could be Badness. I'm not touching that with a ten foot pole. > likely at the moment for October or November, I've gone ahead and > pushed out what results would be shown for those months -- feedback > welcome. > "No report was submitted" ... I think that isn't clear. Most PMCs don't submit reports each month. The real message is "A report was expected, but not submitted". *hand-wave* in nicer messaging. "Minutes awaiting approval to be posted" doesn't show the connection to the report. Something like "Report filed, but display is awaiting the approval of the Board minutes" >... > P.S. For best results, file a JIRA. This started out as appearing to > be an easy fix, but things that require thought or investigation > sometimes get lost unless a ticket is filed. > Agreed. I sent an email thinking the same: "hey! should be easy!" ... heh. I'll let y'all mess around and ponder on the problem, and file a ticket in a couple days or so for any gap in my feature request. Thanks! -g
