[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebb updated WHIMSY-36:
-----------------------
Description:
The script submit-account-request.rb looks for
{code}
/^notinavail:.*?:(.*?):(.*?):Signed CLA/
{code}
when providing suggestions for new accounts
The icla processing scripts should behave in a similar way when extracting info
from the file. The output JSON file should distinguish which entries have a
valid ICLA for both committers and non-committers. This will mean changes to
the file syntax.
was:
The script submit-account-request.rb looks for
/^notinavail:.*?:(.*?):(.*?):Signed CLA/
when providing suggestions for new accounts
The icla processing scripts should behave in a similar way when extracting info
from the file. The output JSON file should distinguish which entries have a
valid ICLA for both committers and non-committers. This will mean changes to
the file syntax.
> icla.rb / public_icla_info.rb should handle entries with no ICLA
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WHIMSY-36
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-36
> Project: Whimsy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Sebb
>
> The script submit-account-request.rb looks for
> {code}
> /^notinavail:.*?:(.*?):(.*?):Signed CLA/
> {code}
> when providing suggestions for new accounts
> The icla processing scripts should behave in a similar way when extracting
> info from the file. The output JSON file should distinguish which entries
> have a valid ICLA for both committers and non-committers. This will mean
> changes to the file syntax.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
