My .02 -- a core assumption of CTR is that people are actively reviewing changes. The intent of CTR is not to reduce oversight. That's an anti-pattern.
Patrick On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Andrei Savu <savu.and...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I want to propose that we change from Review-Then-Commit to > Commit-Then-Review > for a while with the amendment that complicated changes still require code > review. > > The main reason I am asking this is because over the last few weeks I have > noticed > a lack of engagement from the members of the core development team and this > slows > down things a lot. I am happy to see more and more people using Whirr and I > think we > should keep on developing things as fast as possible. > > We can go back to RTC later as soon as we have 3+ active committers. > > What do you think? > > -- Andrei Savu
