Paul I hope so! I'm looking forward to a strong start in 2012 :) On Dec 6, 2011 10:20 PM, "Paul Baclace" <paul.bacl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with Patrick on this. The real issue is the holiday season. > > > Paul > > On 20111206 11:56 , Andrei Savu wrote: > >> Patrick I agree 100% but some code is better than no code. I feel like at >> least for >> a while I have been the only one constantly watching the email list and >> doing >> some work on the open issues. >> >> I don't like the fact that we are delaying this release so much and most >> of >> the >> emails I write on the list get no replies from the rest of the core dev >> team. >> >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Patrick Hunt<ph...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> >> My .02 -- a core assumption of CTR is that people are actively >>> reviewing changes. The intent of CTR is not to reduce oversight. >>> That's an anti-pattern. >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Andrei Savu<savu.and...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> I want to propose that we change from Review-Then-Commit to >>>> Commit-Then-Review >>>> for a while with the amendment that complicated changes still require >>>> >>> code >>> >>>> review. >>>> >>>> The main reason I am asking this is because over the last few weeks I >>>> >>> have >>> >>>> noticed >>>> a lack of engagement from the members of the core development team and >>>> >>> this >>> >>>> slows >>>> down things a lot. I am happy to see more and more people using Whirr >>>> >>> and I >>> >>>> think we >>>> should keep on developing things as fast as possible. >>>> >>>> We can go back to RTC later as soon as we have 3+ active committers. >>>> >>>> What do you think? >>>> >>>> -- Andrei Savu >>>> >>> >
