+1 for cutting the release branch and committing blockers there, as Tom said.
-A On Dec 9, 2011 10:05 PM, "Tom White" <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for cutting the branch. Blocker issues can still be committed to it > after it has been cut. > > Thanks, > Tom > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Andrei Savu <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think we should cut the branch for 0.7.0 as soon as we commit: 437, > 447, > > 384. > > > > We can document in the release notes that we had some issues running > HBase > > & Hama > > on cloudservers, issues that we are going to address in 0.8.0. > > > > This should also allow us to commit some new patches without breaking the > > release (e.g. OSGi support) and delaying things even more. > > > > What do you think? I can start the vote tonight if we make a decision. > > > > -- Andrei Savu > > > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Andrei Savu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> FYI I have created patches for: > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-437 > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-447 > >> > >> And here is the updated test matrix: > >> > >> > >> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvGPW01Ku6xTdE5HRUJwZm1uRE10Wk9kcWE2VncwWEE > >> > >> We are getting to close to cutting the branch. > >> > >> -- Andrei Savu > >> >
