Committed all remaining changes. I am now cutting the branch and start the vote.
-- Andrei Savu On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Andrei Savu <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok. I will cut the branch tonight. In the meantime can someone review 437, > 447, 384? David? Karel? Adrian? Tibor? > > -- Andrei Savu > > > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 for cutting the release branch and committing blockers there, as Tom >> said. >> >> -A >> On Dec 9, 2011 10:05 PM, "Tom White" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > +1 for cutting the branch. Blocker issues can still be committed to it >> > after it has been cut. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Tom >> > >> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Andrei Savu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > I think we should cut the branch for 0.7.0 as soon as we commit: 437, >> > 447, >> > > 384. >> > > >> > > We can document in the release notes that we had some issues running >> > HBase >> > > & Hama >> > > on cloudservers, issues that we are going to address in 0.8.0. >> > > >> > > This should also allow us to commit some new patches without breaking >> the >> > > release (e.g. OSGi support) and delaying things even more. >> > > >> > > What do you think? I can start the vote tonight if we make a decision. >> > > >> > > -- Andrei Savu >> > > >> > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Andrei Savu <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> FYI I have created patches for: >> > >> >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-437 >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-447 >> > >> >> > >> And here is the updated test matrix: >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvGPW01Ku6xTdE5HRUJwZm1uRE10Wk9kcWE2VncwWEE >> > >> >> > >> We are getting to close to cutting the branch. >> > >> >> > >> -- Andrei Savu >> > >> >> > >> > >
