On 7/26/07, Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To finish up, If some where on the way of contributing this autocomplete version I steped on anybodies toes then I am sorry and can bet that it was not intended at all. I am not here to compete in any way with anybody.
heh i dont think this is what janne meant at all. what he is saying is that because you separated everything into a different package and did not do this as a patch it makes it a hell of a lot harder to merge it into extensions codebase and to see exactly where the differences are. screenshots are nice (the mailing list stripped them btw) but having those differences open inside an ide is much better. so here are my two cents: there are two ways of integrating this into our codebase if that is what you want: a) replace our autocomplete with this one - in which case we need to decide how to do it since you did not do this as a patch. b) put this as an alternative into wicket-stuff, maybe wicketstuff-minis project. the added bonus is that you can directly maintain it, the con being that we will essentially have two "competing" implementations of the same thing. competing in the sense that users will have to choose one. -igor
