its easier if you just check this stuff in and we can make changes directly in svn if need be. also register a jira account and let us know what it is and we will create the appropriate projects/permissions.
-igor On 8/16/07, David Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * I changed the license to ASL 2.0. > * I used org.wicketstuff.jquery as groupId for wicketstuff-jquery and > wicketstuff-jquery-examples (previously demo, renamed to follow existing > projects) > * I create a org.wicketstuff:wicketstuff-parent project from where the 2 > others project inherit > * I attach the 3 pom.xml for approbation before importing projects > > Is it OK ? > > /David > > Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > On 8/16/07, David Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> my sf.net id : dwayneb > > > > You're in. > > > >> license of jquery and other js plugins are dual GPL/MIT, ASL, or LGPL > so I don't think there is a possible inclusion into Wicket but for my part > I'll change to ASL. > > > > jquery is dual licensed, and the MIT license is compatible with the > > ASL. So I don't see a problem with that (MIT/X11 is a category A > > license, i.e. source level compatible [1]). > > > >> You suggest to use org.wicketstuff.something for groupId but the > project I saw (dojo, animator) use org.wicketstuff is it normal ? > > > > I don't mind using org.wicketstuff. It is just that if you make more > > subprojects, it is easier to detect them in the repo. Basically it is > > just a suggestion. If you want to make it org.jquery.wicket, I would > > ask why and possibly to reconsider, but not object. > > > > Martijn > > > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html > >
