I don't think there's any harm in leaving it, the problem is that there are known thread-synchronization issues and there is noone willing to fix it :)
-Matej On 10/1/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matej Knopp wrote: > > since we have DiskPageStore and it seems to work quite well and there > > are known threading issues in FilePageStore which noone seems to want > > to fix, I propose a vote to remove FilePageStore, as it no longer > > seems to be necessary. > > > > Thus the options are: > > > > [ ] Remove FilePageStore > > [ ] Keep FilePageStore, because I need it for <insert why> and > > DiskPageStore doesn't cut it because <insert why> > > Does it do any harm leaving it in? DiskPageStore is relatively unproven, > so we could always hedge our bets and leave it in there as an option for > people for whom it works just fine, or in case someone has issues with > DiskPageStore as an alternative. I don't really mind either way. > > Regards, > > Al >
