We already have such thing. It's called SimpleSynchronousPageStore and it uses one file per page all in request thread. So it's not optimized at all, but it can be good for development.
-Matej On 10/22/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > remove the current implementation > the thing martijn wants is easy to make for development mode. Then we do > everything just in the request no fancy stuff just a dump > But the current imlementation does to much, so we could introduce a > DevPageFileStore that just dumps the pages as a file (maybe seperate per > page if pages references pages but thats then all) > > johan > > > On 10/21/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Did we come to a conclusion? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-746 relies on this. > > > > Eelco > > > > On 10/2/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i can fix it a bit, but what i am doing then is don't make it that > > > performant as it is now > > > I just make it a bit more threadsafe by doing a bit more stuff in the > > > request itself.. > > > Then everything is getting a bit easier. > > > > > > But if we remove it, i don't do that extra work of course. > > > > > > johan > > > > > > > > > On 10/1/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 10/1/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I don't think there's any harm in leaving it, the problem is that > > > > > there are known thread-synchronization issues and there is noone > > > > > willing to fix it :) > > > > > > > > Johan doesn't want to?! :-) > > > > > > > > I'm +0 for removing; we have a good alternative, but otoh, a patch > > > > might come in the future. > > > > > > > > Eelco > > > > > > > > > >
