It seems to me that while it's something that Wicket /could/ do, I'm not sure if it's something that Wicket /should/ do...
Having said that, I think I'd be less against it if we restricted it to only tags that had a "wicket:id" attribute? /Gwyn Thursday, November 1, 2007, 2:18:34 PM, you wrote: > It is semanticaly the same. And Firefox really treats <div/> etc. > wrong way. Should we have a vote on this? > -Matej > On 11/1/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> yeah we are generating extra attributes >> but do we introduce tags itself ? >> >> >> On 11/1/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > That's not entirely true. E.g. we generate unique ids for <script> >> > elements, that is altering markup (this is necessary for header >> > contribution filtering). >> > >> > I don't think it would harm to expend those tags. >> > >> > -Matej >> > >> > On 11/1/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > until now we have the policy that we don't alter the markup. >> > > But we could expand all of them if needed. I don't mind to much >> > > >> > > >> > > On 11/1/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Actually, I think that we might want to do this for all tags except >> > > > for couple of selected ones, e.g. <hr /> >> > > > >> > > > This would also reduce confusion of new user when they do <span >> > > > wicket:id="label'/> >> > > > >> > > > -Matej >> > > > >> > > > On 11/1/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > Hi, >> > > > > >> > > > > I noticed that if you add empty <div /> tags to firefox, it treats >> > it >> > > > > like if you forgot to close it. That can cause weird behavior on >> > ajax >> > > > > replacements for example, as it treats the subsequent tags as >> > children >> > > > > of the <div /> tag. >> > > > > >> > > > > I think we should have a MarkupFilter that replaces all <div /> tags >> > > > > with <div></div>. This semes to be also case for <span>, <p>, <b>, >> > ... >> > > > > etc. >> > > > > >> > > > > -Matej >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> -- Best regards, Gwyn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
