On Dec 14, 2007 11:07 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 14, 2007 10:57 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't know if these should go into core just yet. The cluster > > support I put on the wiki was going to work differently without any > > external libs. Basically each node would write the replicated current > > page of the other node to disk so each node has all page of all other > > nodes on disk. That's what I meant by transparent. Marek? > > That's not a configuration I would prefer, but can't we fold that into > the same project? Did you start from scratch? It would be unfortunate > if we only have wicket-stuff projects for this.
Btw, page map replication is one optional part (project); the core mainly exists for generic message passing that is used for normal session clustering. That only imho is worth having a project for. Eelco
