Err, I haven't went through the whole thread, but I don't think the wicket-jetty-cluster is a right thing to put in core. The pagestore can/will be clustered without any dependencies on servlet container. And the wicket-jetty-cluster is mostly a session replication for jetty, there is minimal amount of wicket related stuff.
So I'm not really eager to put this into core. -Matej On Dec 15, 2007 10:13 AM, C. Bergström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 22:44 -0800, Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Matej developed some cluster code that is optimized for Wicket (it has > > for instance a clustered page store) + Jetty and that uses Tomcat > > tribes for cluster communication. I've tweaked (mainly separated it in > > 3 projects to make the dependencies work) and tested it with > > Teachscape. It looks good enough to be a 1.0 release. > > > > If people don't object, I'd like to make these projects part of our > > core projects. I definitively want support this project, since we plan > > to use it for Teachscape soon (on top of additional clustering of for > > instance Lucene and JMX, for which we might use Terracotta). The > > licenses are not a problem (Jetty and Tomcat Tribes mainly), and the > > ASF headers and tests for it are all in place. > > > > It sounds very interesting and while I like the idea.. > > 1) Terracotta license is a very liberal badgeware > 2) Why not work memcached in this somehow.. > a. It has built-in HA/failover/distribution > b. It's blazing fast and efficient at caching things > c. Has an active and growing community > d. Already in production for sites like facebook, myspace, or > hyves > for the dutch on the list.. > > > I haven't worked with the java client connector, but seems to be > maintained and a small example can be found here. Currently builds with > Ant the best I can tell and probably not too difficult to mavenize. > http://www.whalin.com/memcached/HOWTO.txt > > Anywho.. great work Eelco/Igor/Mataj and just trying to add another > perspective.. > >
