there will always be "those two other things" though :) -igor
On Feb 1, 2008 3:43 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it is better to get the 2 other things (are there 2?) that they where > discussing in another thread (that editable ajax thingie or something like > that) > then its fine by me to do a rebuild. But its not a must for me > > johan > > > > On Jan 30, 2008 10:42 PM, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have build our first bug-fix release for 1.3. It's uploaded to my > > p.a.oaccount: > > > > Distribution: > > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.1/dist/ > > > > M2 Repo: > > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.1/m2-repo/ > > > > RAT log file: > > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.1/ > > > > The files has been signed by me and you can find the key here: > > http://www.apache.org/dist/wicket/1.3.0/KEYS > > > > As usual I have tested the release myself and haven't found anything: > > > > - "mvn clean install" in the distribution (linux) > > - "mvn jetty:run" in jdk-1.5/wicket-examples. Random testing of form, > > ajax, pub, guice + some more. (linux, firefox) > > - Check RAT log > > > > > > [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.1 > > [ ] Don't release, because... > > > > > > Thank you in advance, > > Frank Bille > > >
