:-D
Frank Bille wrote:
> I'll end this vote now. Releasing 1.3.1 is accepted with 5 +1 (incl. me).
>
> And I agree that there will always be something else that could be included
> (even though I would have liked those being included if I have had some more
> time)
>
> I'll upload now.
>
> Frank
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2008 10:42 PM, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have build our first bug-fix release for 1.3. It's uploaded to my
>> p.a.oaccount:
>>
>> Distribution:
>> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.1/dist/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.1/dist/>
>>
>> M2 Repo:
>> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.1/m2-repo/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.1/m2-repo/>
>>
>> RAT log file:
>> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.1/>
>>
>> The files has been signed by me and you can find the key here:
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/wicket/1.3.0/KEYS
>>
>> As usual I have tested the release myself and haven't found anything:
>>
>> - "mvn clean install" in the distribution (linux)
>> - "mvn jetty:run" in jdk-1.5/wicket-examples. Random testing of
>> form, ajax, pub, guice + some more. (linux, firefox)
>> - Check RAT log
>>
>>
>> [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.1
>> [ ] Don't release, because...
>>
>>
>> Thank you in advance,
>> Frank Bille
>>
>
