Hi Matej,

sorry for this noobish question, but could you please give me an example of your "factories" idea?

Best,

Korbinian

Matej Knopp schrieb:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Korbinian Bachl - privat
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for clear answer; In case i I add a feature request: would it even be
possible to change the Id at a later time?
No.

-Matej

longer answer: There are many ways to get wicket to do what you want.
Changing the component id is the worst of them. It's dangerous and
unnecessary. Instead of storing wicket components you can just store
factories.

 I catch me regularly to add Components like Links, Panels etc. to a
List<Component> and have them rendered later on to different Markups in
different ListViews - and that means I need to hold them in sync regarding
their id;

 And another feature request idea: would it be OK to add a synonym for
wicket:id="" e.g.: w:id="" or even only :id="" ? Would be some less typing
:)

 Best,

 Korbinian



 Matej Knopp schrieb:



 short question: Why isn't it possible to have a setId(String id) on the
components?
short anwer:

- Is it really necessary that they know their id at  creation-time?

yes

-Matej

 Regards,

 Korbinian








Reply via email to