im fine with whatever as long as i dont have to deal with xml files to setup a build
-igor On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > teamcity's war is 150MB big, vs 19MB for hudson... > > Martijn > > > > On 5/2/08, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Currently the problem I see with teamcity is the memory usage. they > > claim 512M at a minimum. Our tomcat process has 610M at most (the box > > has 750M internal mem). > > > > hudson doesn't state their memory usage. > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > On 5/2/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > we also use it at work and its pretty cool > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:16 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > TeamCity is what we use at work (and what I use at home). They'll > > > > give you an open source license, too. It's VERY nice, IMHO. If you > > > > need help configuring it, I can help out. > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Martijn Dashorst > > > > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'm really inclined to drop bamboo. The frickin thing is already > > > > > converting our installation for over 5 hours. And still no end > to it. > > > > > > > > > > Anyone object to running hudson or teamcity? It will require us > to > > > > > create the build layouts again unfortunately. > > > > > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/2/08, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Ha was just discussing with seb that we need more ram in it. > But i > > > > > > think it is also more disk. All those web apps dont matter to > much. > > > > > > Its all one thing thats bamboo.. If you disable that one then > i guess > > > > > > that machine doesnt do anything any more.. > > > > > > > > > > > > The problem is that seb is going tomorrow to those servers. > But i > > > > > > have no idea how i can quickly get memory (its server memory > so i > > > > > > thing ecc) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/2/08, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > The Wicket stuff server is fairly limited in available > memory. We have > > > > > > > a lot of web apps installed in the folder, and I was > wondering which > > > > > > > apps do we (still) use? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bamboo > > > > > > > grid-examples > > > > > > > jira > > > > > > > probe > > > > > > > teatime > > > > > > > wicket12 > > > > > > > wicket13 > > > > > > > wicket13doc > > > > > > > wicketdojo13 > > > > > > > wicketsecurity > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we can at least drop probe, and possibly wicket12 > (make it a > > > > > > > static page). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > teatime is our IRC log for ##wicket > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it possible to add more memory? I'm willing to donate > enough cash > > > > > > > to upgrade the box to 2G (as long as it is less than or > equal to €100) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > > > > > > > Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released > > > > > > > Get it now: > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > > > > > Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released > > > > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > > Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3 > > > > > -- > > > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3 >
