I'd pick based on what you guys like best.War size != process size != resident mem size. Only the last one counts. The machine has 1024MB of mem, and it's not swapping yet, so it's worth a try.
Futhermore, I'm going to Amsterdam tomorrow for phase 2 of some server migrations, but I need to go back at least one more time for the final phase, so if Johan gets me the mem, I can upgrade next time.
Regards, Sebastiaan Martijn Dashorst wrote:
teamcity's war is 150MB big, vs 19MB for hudson... Martijn On 5/2/08, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Currently the problem I see with teamcity is the memory usage. they claim 512M at a minimum. Our tomcat process has 610M at most (the box has 750M internal mem). hudson doesn't state their memory usage. Martijn On 5/2/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > we also use it at work and its pretty cool > > > -igor > > > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:16 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > TeamCity is what we use at work (and what I use at home). They'll > > give you an open source license, too. It's VERY nice, IMHO. If you > > need help configuring it, I can help out. > > > > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Martijn Dashorst > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm really inclined to drop bamboo. The frickin thing is already > > > converting our installation for over 5 hours. And still no end to it. > > > > > > Anyone object to running hudson or teamcity? It will require us to > > > create the build layouts again unfortunately. > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/2/08, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ha was just discussing with seb that we need more ram in it. But i > > > > think it is also more disk. All those web apps dont matter to much. > > > > Its all one thing thats bamboo.. If you disable that one then i guess > > > > that machine doesnt do anything any more.. > > > > > > > > The problem is that seb is going tomorrow to those servers. But i > > > > have no idea how i can quickly get memory (its server memory so i > > > > thing ecc) > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/2/08, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The Wicket stuff server is fairly limited in available memory. We have > > > > > a lot of web apps installed in the folder, and I was wondering which > > > > > apps do we (still) use? > > > > > > > > > > bamboo > > > > > grid-examples > > > > > jira > > > > > probe > > > > > teatime > > > > > wicket12 > > > > > wicket13 > > > > > wicket13doc > > > > > wicketdojo13 > > > > > wicketsecurity > > > > > > > > > > I think we can at least drop probe, and possibly wicket12 (make it a > > > > > static page). > > > > > > > > > > teatime is our IRC log for ##wicket > > > > > > > > > > Is it possible to add more memory? I'm willing to donate enough cash > > > > > to upgrade the box to 2G (as long as it is less than or equal to €100) > > > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > > > > > Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released > > > > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > > > Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released > > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3 > > > > > > -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
