The Apache Commons project uses Continuum, but come to think of it, I'm not completely certain that it's running on an ASF machine.
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i dont see any problems. anyone can build asf licensed code using any > means and distribute it anywhere/anyhow... > > if asf had a buildserver we would use it, but it doesnt. at least not > that we know of. > > -igor > > > > > On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 5:37 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why are we using a non-ASF build server (not meaning not an ASF > > product, but not hosted by the ASF) to build ASF artifacts in the > > first place? Shouldn't this sort of stuff be done on ASF hardware via > > ASF processes? I can see the wicketstuff "stuff" being done with the > > wicketstuff TeamCity instance, but not the Apache Wicket stuff. I > > realize that this stuff is ASF licensed software, so it's no big deal > > to re-distribute it. I'm just curious if there was an issue with the > > processes/procedures of the ASF with respect to the wants/needs of the > > Apache Wicket project. > > > > > > p.s. By the way, that is officially the most times I've typed "stuff" > > in one email. :) > > > > > > On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Martijn Dashorst > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 5/4/08, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Shouldn't we just disable the apache build configuration and not the > > > > build agent? In theory the wicketstuff build may still run. > > > > > > In practice most stuff projects depend on wicket core :) > > > > > > But you are right, that would be the best action, this is much easier > > > and quicker. > > > > > > > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > -- > > > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > > > Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released > > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3 > > > > > >
