On 5/18/08, Sebastiaan van Erk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, what's wrong with redeploy without restarting tomcat. :-)
This just doesn't work. 1. permgen space errors 2. reboot of server takes >2minutes 3. VM size > 2G is also very resource unfriendly for the GC 4. fast redeploy is very welcome > And you can still think of partitioning it in 2 VM's if one is going to > have to be updated many times, but the rest is relatively stable... > > A huge number of VM's is just not very resource friendly... :-( > > Regards, > Sebastiaan > > > Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > > Because I don't want to shut down jira, confluence, teamcity and so > > forth when deploying the examples. > > > > Martijn > > > > On 5/18/08, Sebastiaan van Erk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Why not go with 1 VM and just use Tomcat's virtual hosting. Using > aliases > > > in apache you only need 1 virtual host (because it has to do the same > thing > > > for every host anyway, and that is forward to tomcat). > > > > > > Regards, > > > Sebastiaan > > > > > > > > > Johan Compagner wrote: > > > > > > > > > > vm's? how many? > > > > > > > > vm's have 1 problem that they all need an excact amount of memory that > > > > they will consume. And the server has now 3G but that doesnt mean that > > > > we can run many vm's on it that all are running tomcat.. Because for > > > > that every vm must be configured to have a bit memory, atleast between > > > > 512M en 1G. > > > > > > > > I would just say if we want multiply instances then every thing that > > > > is pretty static can be in one > > > > > > > (teatime/repo/jira/teamcity/doc) and > > > > > > > all the examples could go into another. I dont see more gain in having > > > > it split up even more. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/18/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, it would make adding VMs set up to run a "site" very easy. > They > > > > > would all look the same (tomcat/jetty, JDK, svn, etc.). So, you'd > > > > > know exactly where to go to make changes. I use Apache virtual > hosts > > > > > at home, too, but I don't have that many domains set up (I have 2 I > > > > > think). Setting up a new instance of Tomcat/Jetty for each one of > > > > > these sites and maintaining the proxy forwards in Apache can be a > > > > > PITA. That's just my $0.02. The sites shouldn't need that much > > > > > memory anyway (JIRA/TeamCity might require more of course). > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Timo Rantalaiho > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 18 May 2008, James Carman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How about setting them up as VMs? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This might require partitioning the memory statically for > > > > > > each virtual server. I think that name-based virtual hosts > > > > > > by Apache on the front would probably be the most cost- > > > > > > effective solution. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > Timo > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Timo Rantalaiho > > > > > > Reaktor Innovations Oy <URL: http://www.ri.fi/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3
