Still waiting to discuss the implementation with Ate before I clean up
the patch and throw away the other implementations - i think he said
he would be back this week from the US, but I imagine he will have
lots to catch up on.
I am also still testing the implementation, and improving it.
On 14/11/2008, at 8:08 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
any news on this? have you had a chance to talk with Ate at all?
-igor
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Antony Stubbs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry for the large email....
I have submitted the patches of my current work, in a draft state.
It's a
working implementation with the one issue that the receiving
portlet can't
be sitting on it's home page (my attempts to circumvent this by
forcing a
redirect on a bookmarkable URL don't seem to have worked).
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1620
I hope the patch can fuel some discussion on the implementation.
I'm going
to switch to working on using this implementation for a while, to
test it
out some more. Hopefully Ate can shed some light on all of this :)
Antony Stubbs wrote:
Ok, so I've got a prototype that works, but has issues. I'm at a
point
where insight from some people in the know would probably help a
lot. I
would also like to describe what I've done, to see if you guys like
***snip*****
-----
___________________________
http://stubbisms.wordpress.com http://stubbisms.wordpress.com
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Finishing-Portal-2.0-development-tp19909563p20302897.html
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
