any news on this? have you had a chance to talk with Ate at all? -igor
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Antony Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry for the large email.... > > I have submitted the patches of my current work, in a draft state. It's a > working implementation with the one issue that the receiving portlet can't > be sitting on it's home page (my attempts to circumvent this by forcing a > redirect on a bookmarkable URL don't seem to have worked). > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1620 > > I hope the patch can fuel some discussion on the implementation. I'm going > to switch to working on using this implementation for a while, to test it > out some more. Hopefully Ate can shed some light on all of this :) > > > Antony Stubbs wrote: >> >> Ok, so I've got a prototype that works, but has issues. I'm at a point >> where insight from some people in the know would probably help a lot. I >> would also like to describe what I've done, to see if you guys like >> ***snip***** >> > > > ----- > ___________________________ > > http://stubbisms.wordpress.com http://stubbisms.wordpress.com > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Finishing-Portal-2.0-development-tp19909563p20302897.html > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
