I don't think it would if you defined it like this in each child... right? <parent> * * <groupId>*org.apache.wicket*</groupId> * * <artifactId>*wicket-parent*</artifactId> * * <version>*1.4-SNAPSHOT*</version> * * </parent>
Because it doesn't have a relative path, Maven just looks up the parent pom like it looks up any other dependency. If you had a relative path, like wicket does to its parent pom, then it would mess up. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so the > SCM links get messed up when you do that. > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tough to be sure - we could experiment. > > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > >> When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't > >> inherit correctly, though. Right? > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms > >> > correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom > >> > for all projects. > >> > > >> > Martijn > >> > > >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Devs, > >> >> In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I > installed > >> a > >> >> Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and > several > >> >> Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most > >> >> projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it > incorrectly > >> >> configured. > >> >> > >> >> I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the > >> >> projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this > >> >> Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to > run > >> it > >> >> past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and let > it > >> run > >> >> for a while as a test. > >> >> > >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Jeremy Thomerson > >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: > http://wicketinaction.com > >> > Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released > >> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Jeremy Thomerson > > http://www.wickettraining.com > > >
