Yes - you're right. Overall, I think it will be much less intrusive to just add or fix the SCM tag in each project. Once I hear back whether anyone is in agreement with this or not, I can proceed (or not).
At some point in the future we should probably discuss some way of creating at least a group of the core projects in wicket-stuff that all build and release together, on the same schedule as Wicket. But I don't want to muddy this build server discussion with that, and I don't have the mental or time bandwidth to work through that right now. So, what does everyone think? Can I update pom files to have correct SCM info and add them to Continuum on my server? -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:15 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > If all of wicketstuff was branched/tagged together, this would work > and you could let the release plugin automagically change it for you. > But, since they all have their own lifecycle (their own > trunk/branches/tags), then you need to configure them individually. > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Jeremy Thomerson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oh, gotcha! I'll try a test with one of my projects and see, but I think > > you're right. > > > > If so, I am still willing to add the SCM info to each pom if necessary - > but > > I still want approval of the crowd since those aren't my projects to > alter. > > > > -- > > Jeremy Thomerson > > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:07 AM, James Carman > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > >> I'm talking about the SCM url itself. It needs to change in the child > >> when a branch/tag is created (because it now lives in a different > >> place). Of course it would be able to find its parent (as long as > >> it's in the local repository). > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy Thomerson > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > I don't think it would if you defined it like this in each child... > >> right? > >> > > >> > <parent> * * <groupId>*org.apache.wicket*</groupId> > >> > * * <artifactId>*wicket-parent*</artifactId> > >> > * * <version>*1.4-SNAPSHOT*</version> > >> > * * </parent> > >> > > >> > Because it doesn't have a relative path, Maven just looks up the > parent > >> pom > >> > like it looks up any other dependency. If you had a relative path, > like > >> > wicket does to its parent pom, then it would mess up. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Jeremy Thomerson > >> > http://www.wickettraining.com > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM, James Carman > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> > > >> >> The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so > the > >> >> SCM links get messed up when you do that. > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson > >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > Tough to be sure - we could experiment. > >> >> > > >> >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman > >> >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't > >> >> >> inherit correctly, though. Right? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst > >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> > Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all > child > >> poms > >> >> >> > correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the > parent > >> pom > >> >> >> > for all projects. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Martijn > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson > >> >> >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> Devs, > >> >> >> >> In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I > >> >> installed > >> >> >> a > >> >> >> >> Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and > >> >> several > >> >> >> >> Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except > that > >> most > >> >> >> >> projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it > >> >> incorrectly > >> >> >> >> configured. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all > of > >> the > >> >> >> >> projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on > >> this > >> >> >> >> Continuum server. But since those aren't my projects, I wanted > to > >> >> run > >> >> >> it > >> >> >> >> past the group first. What do you think? We could do this and > >> let > >> >> it > >> >> >> run > >> >> >> >> for a while as a test. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> >> Jeremy Thomerson > >> >> >> >> http://www.wickettraining.com > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > -- > >> >> >> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: > >> >> http://wicketinaction.com > >> >> >> > Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released > >> >> >> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Jeremy Thomerson > >> >> > http://www.wickettraining.com > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >
