Martin,
  Just as a side note - I just verified that the license can be overridden
by child projects - simply define a different license and maven ignores the
parent license.  I am trying to organize the projects in Wicket Stuff, and
have created a common core-parent.  Please look here and note the comments I
have in the license section.  This was verified with mvn site:site....

https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-core/pom.xml

Thanks!
-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Martin Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Hi Jeremy,
>
> just saw your commits on wicket-stuff.
>
> I allways like any attempt to get some more stucture into wicket-stuff.
>
> One thing I saw was the licences tag in the pom.xml
>
> http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/trunk/pom.xml?revision=4329&view=markup&pathrev=4329
>
>   16   <licenses>
>   17           <!-- default license (to override if needed) -->
>   18           <license>
>   19                   <name>The Apache Software License, Version
> 2.0</name>
>   20                   <url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> </url>
>   21                   <distribution>repo</distribution>
>   22           </license>
>   23   </licenses>
>
> Not sure if maven allows 'overriding' here you can only extend the list
> elements
> of a parent.pom, so the Apache License will show up in all its children.
> I'm not sure what legal issus this imposes if multiple liceses appear.
>
>
> mf
>
>
> 2008/11/18 Jeremy Thomerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Okay, all of yours are added (includeing the persistence-template /
> > iolite).
> >
> > wicket-contrib-openlayers-examples doesn't compile
> >
> > The rest are all building fine.
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Also:
> > >
> > > wicket-contrib-accordian is named "Wicket Contrib Openlayers"
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Nino,
> > >>   I'm updating your poms and adding yours.  I ran into a problem - you
> > >> have wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the
> same
> > >> group and artifact IDs.
> > >>
> > >>   I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me
> > what
> > >> the difference is?  Maybe one should be renamed?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> <
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers
> > >>>
> > >>> I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be
> > >>> more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of
> > >>> wicket...
> > >>>
> > >>> Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>  -Wicket for love
> > >>>
> > >>> Nino Martinez Wael
> > >>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
> > >>> http://www.jayway.dk
> > >>> +45 2936 7684
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  --
> > >> Jeremy Thomerson
> > >> http://www.wickettraining.com
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jeremy Thomerson
> > > http://www.wickettraining.com
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to