matej really really wants WICKET-2207 in 1.3.6 so i will rebuild the
release, and matej has graciously volunteered to test it.

-igor

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> it can go into 1.3.7 if 1.3.6 build is fine.
>
> -igor
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Matej Knopp <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Just committed fix for WICKET-2207 to 1.3
>>
>> -Matej
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Juergen Donnerstag
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> In Maven you define the java compatibility rules for the source and
>>> target only, but not the java version. Using JAVA_HOME is correct.
>>> Please try "maven clean" before you build it.
>>>
>>> Juergen
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Willis Blackburn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Juergen,
>>>>
>>>> Probably.  I thought that Maven set the right Java version.
>>>>
>>>> I tried setting JAVA_HOME to the 1.5 version and putting that in my PATH,
>>>> but now I get a build error.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not a Maven build expert by any means, but I built the trunk code just
>>>> yesterday without any problems.  I'm on OS X, if that matters.
>>>>
>>>> W
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 26, 2009, at 8:22 AM, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> are you using java 6? HashMap implementation in J6 has changed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Juergen
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Willis Blackburn <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I saw 7 unit test failures.  All of them seem to involve attribute order
>>>>>> changes in the HTML.  Is that what you're expecting?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> W
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 26, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a few people have been asking for 1.3.6, i had time to build a
>>>>>>> release, but not to test it. can someone please check it out and if
>>>>>>> all is good start a vote to release it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> svn: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/ivaynberg/1.3.6
>>>>>>> artifacts: people.apache.org/x1/home/ivaynberg/wicket-1.3.6
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>> -igor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to