/** Disabled until we fixed the issue that WicketTestCase or WicketTester is not available in other projects. They are in src/test/java. Maven will create a compile error since in Maven the test folder is not exported, which is what we want. We don't want the test cases to be part of the Wicket distribution jar. In Eclipse it works since all source folders are exported and you can not disable specific ones. */
Juergen On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Martin Funk<[email protected]> wrote: > yeah, but than its only half of the fun :-) > > mf > Am 22.06.2009 um 19:43 schrieb Igor Vaynberg: > >> if you dont like failures dont svn up off a trunk :) >> >> -igor >> >> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Martin Funk<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Beyond that compilation failure I noticed that there are two incarnations >>> of >>> org.apache.wicket.WicketTestCase on in wicket and one in >>> wicket-extensions. >>> They seem so similar, that I fail to see a reason for their double >>> existence. >>> >>> One more I got. The tests are broken for quite a while now: >>> >>> http://wicketstuff.org/teamcity/viewType.html?buildTypeId=bt2&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv >>> >>> Actually I don't really want to be such a pain, but a successful >>> svn update >>> mvn clean install >>> just gives me such a great start in my day that I don't want to miss >>> that. >>> >>> mf >>> >>> Am 22.06.2009 um 17:39 schrieb Igor Vaynberg: >>> >>>> compilation failure is in a test class, looks like someone didnt move >>>> the test case. something that would work in eclipse but not with >>>> maven. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://wicketstuff.org/teamcity/viewLog.html?buildId=4051&tab=buildResultsDiv&buildTypeId=bt2 >>>> >>>> -igor >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Juergen >>>> Donnerstag<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I just did "maven -Dmaven.test.skip=true clean install" and it >>>>> completed successfully (on 1.4 trunk from 18 hrs ago). >>>>> >>>>> -Juergen >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Martin Funk<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> anyone else bothered by that? >>>>>> >>>>>> mf >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> > >
