On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote: > So ObjectModel will hold a single object only? What about lists and > collections? Are you serious? A collection is still one instance. It doesn't matter how many references it holds.
-Matej > IMHO the "Object.." prefix has no benefit. > > Why not drop the Model class altogether? > Its static helper methods could be located in a new non-instantiable class > Models (note the trailing 's') because there's nothing more exciting the > Model class currently provides. > > My 2 cents > > Sven > > > Matej Knopp wrote: >> >> Should we rename IModel to Model we would also have to rename Model to >> something. ObjectModel sounds like a really good name to me because it >> says what it does. Holds single object. >> >> Locator sounds really weird. I think renaming Model to Locator would >> be hell lot more confusing than renaming IModel to Model. >> >> -Matej >> >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Martin Grigorov <mcgreg...@e-card.bg> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> +1 for removing 'I'. I personally do like it but since this is what the >>> committers prefer than I'm fine. >>> >>> -1 for renaming Model to anything else. >>> @Erik: it'd be interesting to be at a course of jWeekend where you'll >>> explain to the attendees "Wicket consists of components, models, ... and >>> the basic model is Locator (and all implementations end with **Model)". >>> I'll find it confusing. >>> I hope Wicket 1.5 will not rename all existing Model implementations. >>> >>> A side note: some third party projects already depends on 'I' classes. >>> For example Terracotta depends on IClusterable for its Wicket module. >>> Take this into account as well. >>> >>> El dom, 04-10-2009 a las 13:55 +0200, Erik van Oosten escribió: >>> >>>> >>>> I agree, the I is useless. Provided there is a good migration I'd say: >>>> +1. >>>> >>>> I also agree with Martin, lets change IModel to Locator while we're at >>>> it! >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Erik. >>>> >>>> >>>> Igor Vaynberg wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names? wicket >>>>> has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows this >>>>> convention, is it time for a change? >>>>> >>>>> this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh >>>>> aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should switch. >>>>> >>>>> -igor >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > >
