Mythbusters has proved that a lead balloon can rise. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZSkM-QEeUg
Ryan Gravener http://bit.ly/no_word_docs On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:06 PM, jWeekend <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > I agree, names like IThing and ThingImpl can be a sign of not thinking too > hard about naming things (and even a rush to get coding without enough > thought put into design - but that's a long story). For me, dropping those > "I" prefixes and any "Impl" suffixes will make the project code-base look > even more credible. I don't think we have too many ...Impl's at all (and > that's by far the most offensive of these 2 naming anti-patterns). > The way to you suggest introducing this improvement to the is my preferred, > gentle and step by step, technique too for such a project. > > Regards - Cemal > jWeekend > OO & Java Technologies, Wicket Training and Development > http://jWeekend.com > > PS How about - avoid starting new lines with braces where not absolutely > necessary, too? it's OK, I know this will go down like a lead balloon :-) > > > > > > igor.vaynberg wrote: >> >> we dont do these annoying refactors for no reason. we do not like >> something about the code and want to fix it. >> >> as far as migration pains we can ease that. >> >> take IRequestCycleProcessor as an example. >> >> we can create >> >> interface RequestCycleProcessor extends IRequestCycleProcessor and >> deprecate IRequestCycleProcessor. >> >> release this as 1.5.0.migration jar and then release 1.5.0 with >> IRequestCycleProcessor removed. this gives you as much time as you >> want to migrate your code. >> >> -igor >> >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 4:14 PM, tetsuo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> -1 >>> >>> It breaks compatibility for absolutely no reason. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Johan Edstrom <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Oct 2, 2009, at 17:28, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names? wicket >>>>> has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows this >>>>> convention, is it time for a change? >>>>> >>>>> this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh >>>>> aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should switch. >>>>> >>>>> -igor >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/taking-the-I-out-of-Interface-tp25723691p25754608.html > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
