It has been shown many times why this change was a bad idea. Nevermind the theoretical nature of the initial objections, which have also been shown to be true concerns (see http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6489540). It has been shown that this change doesn't really solve anything anyway. In fact, it encourages a programming practice (starting short-lived, one-off threads) that most feel is not a good idea and doesn't scale.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Alex Objelean <alex.objel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > My vote is -1. Unless we have a good way to prove the problem, not only > theoretical presumption, we shouldn't revert it in next release. > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/vote-Revert-WICKET-2846-tp2226987p2229151.html > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
