i will play around with splitting and we can see what happens -igor
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:04 AM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > +1 > On Dec 29, 2010 12:49 PM, "Igor Vaynberg" <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> i think core and sandbox are probably better names and more clearly >> communicate the intent. >> >> -igor >> >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Martijn Dashorst >> <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Currently our wicketstuff repo at github is one gigantic repo >>> containing everything. I'd like to propose to split the repository >>> into two: >>> >>> - github.com/wicketstuff/wicketstuff (containing just the core > project) >>> - github.com/wicketstuff/archive (containing all the >>> side projects) >>> >>> The idea is that wicketstuff core is already a huge project, and I'd >>> like to make the footprint contain just that, without the legacy >>> projects that surround the core. >>> >>> I'd like to do this before folks start cloning away, so before we >>> announce the availability. But if anyone wants to wait that's fine >>> with me as well... >>> >>> Anyone got ideas or a different opinion? >>> >>> Martijn >>> >>> -- >>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >>> >
