Great, I won't be of much help as I left my laptop at work due to a mishap with my car (apparent broken battery) and needing to entertain the AAA guy.
Martijn On Wednesday, December 29, 2010, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote: > i will play around with splitting and we can see what happens > > -igor > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:04 AM, James Carman > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: >> +1 >> On Dec 29, 2010 12:49 PM, "Igor Vaynberg" <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> i think core and sandbox are probably better names and more clearly >>> communicate the intent. >>> >>> -igor >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Martijn Dashorst >>> <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Currently our wicketstuff repo at github is one gigantic repo >>>> containing everything. I'd like to propose to split the repository >>>> into two: >>>> >>>> - github.com/wicketstuff/wicketstuff (containing just the core >> project) >>>> - github.com/wicketstuff/archive (containing all the >>>> side projects) >>>> >>>> The idea is that wicketstuff core is already a huge project, and I'd >>>> like to make the footprint contain just that, without the legacy >>>> projects that surround the core. >>>> >>>> I'd like to do this before folks start cloning away, so before we >>>> announce the availability. But if anyone wants to wait that's fine >>>> with me as well... >>>> >>>> Anyone got ideas or a different opinion? >>>> >>>> Martijn >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >>>> >> > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
