it's not 100% of Java's level,mostly cause Scala is a much more complex language.
But it will do the right thing about 90% of the time. you'll subconsciously work around 4 or 5% of the rest that doesn't work, and the remaining 5-6% will irritate you. That's my perception, of course... Among the list of things I found that may annoy you: - imports sometimes get messed up (relative vs absolute, I hate that in scala) and require a manual correction - compilation is slower than sbt in "~ compile" so I never use it - analysis is useful about 90% of the time, but it's so slow you may just not care for it - it crashes the JVM on Oracle's JRockit (although IDEA is much faster in that jvm) On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Liam Clarke-Hutchinson <l...@steelsky.co.nz>wrote: > Define complete. > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Martin Makundi < > martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: > > > Nice or complete? > > > > ** > > Martin > > > > 2011/1/7 Jonathan Locke <jonathan.lo...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Have you checked out IDEA? My Scala friends tell me it has pretty nice > > Scala > > > support. > > > > > > Jon > > > > > > "Less is more." > > > > > > http://www.amazon.com/Coding-Software-Process-Jonathan-Locke/dp/0615404820/ > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Scala-Wicket-Help-and-Advice-tp3174601p3185239.html > > > Sent from the Forum for Wicket Core developers mailing list archive at > > Nabble.com. > > > > > >
