you will also have to change the value in wicket.properties it shouldnt say initializer=<classname> anymore then.
-igor On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Eelco Hillenius <eelco.hillen...@gmail.com >> wrote: > >> Doesn't solve anything in particular, right? Personally, I think the >> current names are fine. >> > > We've always opted for specific, descriptive names, even when grossly > verbose :) I, too, think we should rename it. I like the approach of > moving it to an interface that extends IInitializer, deprecate and remove in > 1.6. Although, I feel like a 1.5 name change would be absolutely fine - > even with an RC out. It's a simple find/replace - not a complicated change. > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://wickettraining.com > *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org* >
