> We've always opted for specific, descriptive names, even when grossly > verbose :) I, too, think we should rename it. I like the approach of > moving it to an interface that extends IInitializer, deprecate and remove in > 1.6. Although, I feel like a 1.5 name change would be absolutely fine - > even with an RC out. It's a simple find/replace - not a complicated change.
Simple maybe, but it does break the public API and some documentation (I think Wicket In Action mentions it), and that for no benefit other than that some people like the name better (you amongst others) and other people don't (me, Jonathan I'm guessing). I don't think it is worth it. Eelco
