What is so broken about the current ajax in Wicket, that requires such
rewrite?



On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]>wrote:

> staged approach is fine, however its step 2 only that will cause
> migration headaches, so this is just delaying the inevitable...
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the recent ticket changes by Igor I mentioned few comments that
> > Ajax will be re-written for Wicket.next (1.6, 3.0, 6.0 - whatever we
> > call it).
> >
> > I want to share my experience with trying to re-vive Matej's work at [1],
> [2].
> > The changes there are a bit drastic (maybe because the task hasn't
> > been finished and the API breaks not cleaned) and knowing how Ajax
> > heavy are the applications I've worked on I think it will be quite a
> > work to migrate the apps from 1.5 to Wicket.next.
> > I also tried to introduce wicket-ajax.jar with the new impl and keep
> > the old one for transition but that wasn't easy too.
> >
> > So I want to propose a two step approach:
> > 1) introduce some JavaScript library for Wicket.next and improve
> > wicket-xyz.js files by using it
> > 2) improve/reimplement Wicket Ajax for Wicket.next+1
> >
> >
> > martin-g
> >
> > 1.
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
> > 2. https://github.com/martin-g/wicket/tree/ajax2
> >
>

Reply via email to