Hi, On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Hielke Hoeve <[email protected]> wrote: > Emond Papegaaij and I have also attempted to see if it is possible to > integrate a small part of WiQuery's functionality into Wicket. We are still > working on cleaning the code but here is a preview: > https://github.com/papegaaij/wicket/compare/trunk...wicket+wiquery#files_bucket > > Basically we have implemented > AbstractDependencyRespectingResourceAggregatingHeaderResponse ( :-) ) and > have it build jQuery statements for window load and dom ready. All resources > are automatically an AbstractResourceDependentResourceReference, this will > not break current resources it will only allow them to specify their > dependencies.
I like the change as a whole. We had recently some complains that Wicket itself doesn't use its dependency management for resource references. What I think we should do is to remove all uses of jQuery() in .java and replace them with Wicket.Event.add(). > > Hielke Hoeve > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: woensdag 16 november 2011 11:05 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Wicket 6 development > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 >> >> (I'd love to take a look at the new jquery stuff.) > > https://github.com/martin-g/wicket/tree/ajax-jquery > Basically the internals of wicket-ajax.js (partially), wicket-event.js > (fully) and wicket-ajax-debug.js (fully) are redone with JQuery. > Also there are ~ 90 QUnit tests at > https://github.com/martin-g/wicket/tree/ajax-jquery/wicket-core/src/test/js > >> >> Sven >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Martin Grigorov [mailto:[email protected]] >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. November 2011 10:01 >> An: [email protected] >> Betreff: Re: Wicket 6 development >> >> +1 >> >> I have quite some progress with JQuery-fying Wicket's javascripts and >> I'd like to move it in trunk and involve more people in >> designing/coding/discussing/... it. >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Martijn Dashorst >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> We have released 3 bug fixes to 1.5.x and it seems like it is more >>> stable now. Stuff for wicket.next is piling up, so I propose we start >>> our wicket-6.x.y work, using semantic versioning. Since Wicket 6 will >>> be a breaker API wise, we can just stick with trunk for new >>> development, and move maintenance for 1.5.x to a branch. >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> Martijn >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Martin Grigorov >> jWeekend >> Training, Consulting, Development >> http://jWeekend.com >> >> > > > > -- > Martin Grigorov > jWeekend > Training, Consulting, Development > http://jWeekend.com > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com
