On Tuesday 22 November 2011 13:09:08 Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Hielke Hoeve <[email protected]> wrote: > > Emond Papegaaij and I have also attempted to see if it is possible to > > integrate a small part of WiQuery's functionality into Wicket. We are > > still working on cleaning the code but here is a preview: > > https://github.com/papegaaij/wicket/compare/trunk...wicket+wiquery#file > > s_bucket > > > > Basically we have implemented > > AbstractDependencyRespectingResourceAggregatingHeaderResponse ( :-) ) > > and have it build jQuery statements for window load and dom ready. All > > resources are automatically an > > AbstractResourceDependentResourceReference, this will not break current > > resources it will only allow them to specify their dependencies. > I like the change as a whole. > We had recently some complains that Wicket itself doesn't use its > dependency management for resource references. > > What I think we should do is to remove all uses of jQuery() in .java > and replace them with Wicket.Event.add().
And wicket-event-jquery.js will convert this to $(document).ready or $(window).load right? > > Hielke Hoeve > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: woensdag 16 november 2011 11:05 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Wicket 6 development > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 > >> > >> (I'd love to take a look at the new jquery stuff.) > > > > https://github.com/martin-g/wicket/tree/ajax-jquery > > Basically the internals of wicket-ajax.js (partially), wicket-event.js > > (fully) and wicket-ajax-debug.js (fully) are redone with JQuery. > > Also there are ~ 90 QUnit tests at > > https://github.com/martin-g/wicket/tree/ajax-jquery/wicket-core/src/test > > /js> > >> Sven > >> > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: Martin Grigorov [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. November 2011 10:01 > >> An: [email protected] > >> Betreff: Re: Wicket 6 development > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> I have quite some progress with JQuery-fying Wicket's javascripts and > >> I'd like to move it in trunk and involve more people in > >> designing/coding/discussing/... it. > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Martijn Dashorst > >> > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> We have released 3 bug fixes to 1.5.x and it seems like it is more > >>> stable now. Stuff for wicket.next is piling up, so I propose we > >>> start > >>> our wicket-6.x.y work, using semantic versioning. Since Wicket 6 > >>> will > >>> be a breaker API wise, we can just stick with trunk for new > >>> development, and move maintenance for 1.5.x to a branch. > >>> > >>> WDYT? > >>> > >>> Martijn > >> > >> -- > >> Martin Grigorov > >> jWeekend > >> Training, Consulting, Development > >> http://jWeekend.com > > > > -- > > Martin Grigorov > > jWeekend > > Training, Consulting, Development > > http://jWeekend.com
