And sorry for typing your name wrong … Am 14.12.2011 um 15:59 schrieb Peter Ertl:
> That's awesome, Edmond! > > Thanks! :-) > > Am 14.12.2011 um 15:47 schrieb Emond Papegaaij: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've finished most of the work on the branch, including some of the >> suggestions that were made in this thread. IHeaderResponse now has only 1 >> render method left, which takes a HeaderItem. This simplified everything >> related to IHeaderResponse quite a bit, and also fixed WICKET-4247. I've >> also >> implemented the circular dependency detection, fixed the original example to >> use the new API and added javadoc in most places. >> >> Things that still need to be done: >> - Finish javadoc >> - Add some more tests >> - Fix WICKET-4000 and WIKCET-4235 (which I'd rather do after this branch has >> been merged into wicket) >> >> The code can still be found on github at: >> https://github.com/papegaaij/wicket/compare/trunk...wicket%2Bwiquery >> >> Best regards, >> Emond >> >> On Friday 02 December 2011 09:33:44 Emond Papegaaij wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> For the past few weeks, and especially the last few days, Hielke Hoeve and I >>> have been working on improvements to resource management in Wicket. Most of >>> the improvements are based on work in WiQuery, but the actual >>> implementation is from scratch. The targets for the improvements can be >>> found in WICKET-4273. In short, it boils down to following points: >>> - Dependency support for resources >>> - Sorting of resources in the header >>> - Native resource bundle support in Wicket >>> - Aggregating many small scripts into 1 large script tag, esp. for events >>> >>> The target for these changes will be Wicket 6 and the work in progress can >>> be found on github: >>> https://github.com/papegaaij/wicket/compare/trunk...wicket%2Bwiquery >>> >>> At the moment, all features, except the resource bundles are implemented and >>> working. Documentation is still missing on most places. I've also not yet >>> come to writing tests and an example on how to use it. >>> >>> Please provide your feedback on the code, here on the mailing list or at >>> JIRA. >>> >>> Note to Jeremy: I deleted some of the code you contributed to Wicket 1.5 >>> because there was a large overlap in functionality, and it proved difficult >>> to keep the old code working as is. It would be great if you could shed >>> some light on what the exact problem was, you were trying to solve with >>> that code, so I can make sure that it can also be solved with this new >>> approach. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Emond Papegaaij >
