I am -1 to require Servlet 3.0 for -core. Currently Wicket core doesn't even need anything from 2.5. 2.4 covers all our needs. Requiring Servlet 3.0 for Wicket 6 will leave some users at 1.4.x/1.5.x and we all can agree there is no much man power in supporting old branches at the moment.Anyone ever tried doing anything with AsyncContext within a Wicket Page ? I see some benefit in IResource but creating custom IResource for that doesn't require -core to depend on 3.0. My 2c On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Peter Ertl<pe...@gmx.org> wrote:+1 atmosphere alone is reason enough, no reason to stay on< 3.0 forever and there are enough servers out there supporting it Am 13.04.2012 um 14:32 schrieb Emond Papegaaij:Hi all, It was already mentioned by Martijn some time ago as a suggestion for the roadmap for Wicket 6, but it was never decided. The question is: should we move to servlet-api 3.0 or stay at 2.5. Servlet 3.0 has been around for over 2 years now and is supported by most (all?) servlet containers. It allows us to use things like the new annotations and asynchronous servlets. I'm +1 for moving to servlet 3.0 and already have some work done on the sandbox/atmosphere branch to get it working. Best regards, Emond
-1 to jump on Servlet 3.0. Tomcat 6 is still be widely used as
deployment server and if we required version 3.0 we would prevent a lot
of people from migrating to Wicket 6.
- Move to servlet-api 3.0 for Wicket 6 Emond Papegaaij
- Re: Move to servlet-api 3.0 for Wicket 6 tetsuo
- Re: Move to servlet-api 3.0 for Wicket 6 Peter Ertl
- Re: Move to servlet-api 3.0 for Wicket 6 James Carman
- Re: Move to servlet-api 3.0 for Wicket 6 Martin Grigorov
- Re: Move to servlet-api 3.0 for Wicket 6 Andrea Del Bene
- Re: Move to servlet-api 3.0 for Wicket 6 Emond Papegaaij
- Re: Move to servlet-api 3.0 for Wicket 6 Johan Compagner
- Re: Move to servlet-api 3.0 for Wicket 6 Emond Papegaaij