right, it's 453-2- :-)
Am 05.05.2012 um 20:14 schrieb Sven Meier: > We're probably talking about WICKET-453*2*, IMHO it can still be improved for > the next 6.0 beta. > > Sven > > On 05/05/2012 07:00 PM, Emond Papegaaij wrote: >> The ticket you mentioned is already fixed in 6.0. I fixed it right after >> filing it. >> >> Best regards >> Emond >> Op 5 mei 2012 14:16 schreef "Peter Ertl"<[email protected]> het volgende: >> >>> Hi wicket team, >>> >>> I would like to fix WICKET-4533 but 6.0.0 is darn close. So could you >>> possibly take a look at >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4533and tell me if it will be >>> okay to commit the patch? >>> >>> Thanks and best regards >>> Peter >
