so, this time with the correct link https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4532
let me know what you think :-) Am 06.05.2012 um 01:07 schrieb Peter Ertl: > right, it's 453-2- :-) > > > Am 05.05.2012 um 20:14 schrieb Sven Meier: > >> We're probably talking about WICKET-453*2*, IMHO it can still be improved >> for the next 6.0 beta. >> >> Sven >> >> On 05/05/2012 07:00 PM, Emond Papegaaij wrote: >>> The ticket you mentioned is already fixed in 6.0. I fixed it right after >>> filing it. >>> >>> Best regards >>> Emond >>> Op 5 mei 2012 14:16 schreef "Peter Ertl"<[email protected]> het volgende: >>> >>>> Hi wicket team, >>>> >>>> I would like to fix WICKET-4533 but 6.0.0 is darn close. So could you >>>> possibly take a look at >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4533and tell me if it will be >>>> okay to commit the patch? >>>> >>>> Thanks and best regards >>>> Peter >> >
