On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Martijn Dashorst <[email protected]> wrote: > WICKET-2128 needs to be resolved for 6.0 final. We can't change it in > 6.1 or 6.2 (even though it is not strictly an API break, it would > wreak havoc on users upgrading between those versions). > > It has my support to go from ${input} to ${label} in the properties > files (AFAIK I was one of the detractors to this issue, so that would > change my vote from -1 to +1 on this issue)
I'm +1 as well > > Martijn > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I think it's time to release the next version of 6.x >> The question is: how to name it - a beta or a release candidate ? >> Looking at Jira I think it should be RC1. We had a very few tickets >> with almost no API changes. >> >> Please say your preference. >> I'll be able to build it early next week. >> >> -- >> Martin Grigorov >> jWeekend >> Training, Consulting, Development >> http://jWeekend.com > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com
