It is a parent ticket for any OSGi related ticket. I just added WICKET-4517 as a sub-task to it.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Martijn Dashorst <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a reason why WICKET-4438 is still not closed? > > Martijn > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Martijn Dashorst > <[email protected]> wrote: >> WICKET-2128 needs to be resolved for 6.0 final. We can't change it in >> 6.1 or 6.2 (even though it is not strictly an API break, it would >> wreak havoc on users upgrading between those versions). >> >> It has my support to go from ${input} to ${label} in the properties >> files (AFAIK I was one of the detractors to this issue, so that would >> change my vote from -1 to +1 on this issue) >> >> Martijn >> >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think it's time to release the next version of 6.x >>> The question is: how to name it - a beta or a release candidate ? >>> Looking at Jira I think it should be RC1. We had a very few tickets >>> with almost no API changes. >>> >>> Please say your preference. >>> I'll be able to build it early next week. >>> >>> -- >>> Martin Grigorov >>> jWeekend >>> Training, Consulting, Development >>> http://jWeekend.com >> >> >> >> -- >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com
