+1 I don't have anything major with 6.0 yet so I gave my training application a quick&dirty port to 6.0 from 1.5. Everything seems to work fine after a few adjustments.
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:27:10 +0200 Emond Papegaaij <emond.papega...@topicus.nl> wrote: > +1 > > Checked: > - tag (with signing) > - zip contents and build > - selenium tests for a large application > > Emond > > On Thursday 23 August 2012 23:13:28 Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal. > > > > Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after > > checking them thoroughly for any misgivings: > > > > - tag: wicket-6.0.0 > > - release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0 > > - artifacts: > > - apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz > > - apache-wicket-6.0.0.zip > > > > They can be found at my p.a.o place: > > http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-6.0.0 > > > > I have uploaded the signatures and hashes as well. I also signed the > > release tag (wicket-6.0.0). Probably you can sign the tag as well if > > you find the release to be OK (I haven't done such a thing myself, > > so you need to look it up somewhere—Emond?) > > > > [ ] +1 release Apache Wicket 6.0.0 > > [ ] -1 don't release Apache Wicket 6.0.0 > > > > This vote lasts for 4 days, due to the weekend coming up. I'll tally > > tuesday morning CET. > > > > Martijn
