What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4705? We have about 10 wicket applications, including an ecommerce website running wicket, but we use the autocomplete a lot.
Thanks On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Carl-Eric Menzel <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > I don't have anything major with 6.0 yet so I gave my training > application a quick&dirty port to 6.0 from 1.5. Everything seems to > work fine after a few adjustments. > > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:27:10 +0200 > Emond Papegaaij <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Checked: >> - tag (with signing) >> - zip contents and build >> - selenium tests for a large application >> >> Emond >> >> On Thursday 23 August 2012 23:13:28 Martijn Dashorst wrote: >> > No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal. >> > >> > Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after >> > checking them thoroughly for any misgivings: >> > >> > - tag: wicket-6.0.0 >> > - release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0 >> > - artifacts: >> > - apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz >> > - apache-wicket-6.0.0.zip >> > >> > They can be found at my p.a.o place: >> > http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-6.0.0 >> > >> > I have uploaded the signatures and hashes as well. I also signed the >> > release tag (wicket-6.0.0). Probably you can sign the tag as well if >> > you find the release to be OK (I haven't done such a thing myself, >> > so you need to look it up somewhere—Emond?) >> > >> > [ ] +1 release Apache Wicket 6.0.0 >> > [ ] -1 don't release Apache Wicket 6.0.0 >> > >> > This vote lasts for 4 days, due to the weekend coming up. I'll tally >> > tuesday morning CET. >> > >> > Martijn >
