On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to discuss where we are with Wicket 7 and what to do next. > > At the moment there are just > 3<https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20WICKET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%227.0.0%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20summary%20ASC> > tickets > with "Fix Version" 7.0.0. > > One <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5172> of them is about > adding a link for the javadoc at http://wicket.apache.org. Trivial. > > Another <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4951> is about > CDI-1.1. John Sarman is helping here. Thanks!
i havent had time to keep up with this, be sure we do not lock ourselves into weld... > And the last <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5184> one is > about the signature of AbstractTree/Model.ofSet(). I don't see a good > solution here, but I have provided a workaround. > > > In the roadmap page there is also: > > Refactor checkgroup/radiogroup to make them non > components<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Wicket+7.0+Roadmap#Wicket7.0Roadmap-Refactorcheckgroup%2Fradiogrouptomakethemnoncomponents.> > - > @Igor: do you want to work yourself on this ? Otherwise please give more > details how you imagine the new way. im fine with someone else taking this one. the basic idea is to make CheckGroup and RadioGroup non-components because in a lot of cases it is inconvenient to have them wrap some sections. eg when you have two check groups you have to put one inside the other, which is non-intuitive. so the groups are linked by the instance of CheckGroup and RadioGroup objects which can take care of generating unique ids, etc. so instead of code like this: RadioGroup group=new RadioGroup(); add(group); group.add(new Radio()); we would have RadioGroup group=new RadioGroup(); add(new Radio("id", group)); makes sense? -igor > > Make CSS class strings used in the framework > configurable<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Wicket+7.0+Roadmap#Wicket7.0Roadmap-Makecssclassstringsusedintheframeworkconfigurable> > - > this one is clear. If there are no objections then I'll pick it soon > (unless someone else does it before me). > > I'm going to investigate few tickets about bookmarkable mappers > (MountMapper, MountedMapper, PackageMapper and ResourceMapper) and their > handling of named parameters in the path/segments. > > Unless someone has more ideas what can be improved for Wicket 7 I think we > are pretty close to be "feature complete" and we can release a milestone or > release candidate. > > I'd like to thank Cedric Gatay, Michael Mossman, Andrea Del Bene and John > Sarman for their help so far!
