>From its README file: Compatibility Turbolinks is designed to work with any browser that fully supports pushState and all the related APIs. This includes Safari 6.0+ (but not Safari 5.1.x!), IE10, and latest Chromes and Firefoxes.
Do note that existing JavaScript libraries may not all be compatible with Turbolinks out of the box due to the change in instantiation cycle. You might very well have to modify them to work with Turbolinks' new set of events. Is this really broadly used ?! Can't you simulate it with a (Transparent)WebMarkupContainer that wraps all the content in your page ? Wicket filters the loaded CSS/JS resources anyway. The only thing that's left is Browser Back button support. On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Cedric Gatay <[email protected]> wrote: > TurboLinks looks really cool, I think it could be a nice thing to have in > Wicket for applications targeting recent web browsers. > > __ > Cedric Gatay (@Cedric_Gatay <http://twitter.com/Cedric_Gatay>) > http://code-troopers.com | http://www.bloggure.info | > http://cedric.gatay.fr > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Has anyone thought (or even known about) the knockoutjs library? > > > > > > > I'm impressed with it, and I'm integrating it with our application > (that > > > integration means less wicket usage). > > > > > > > Some of the developers in Lift Web Framework were also impressed by it. > Now > > they are more impressed from AngularJs/EmberJs/youNameItJs. > > Few years ago everyone wrote his own Java web framework, now it is the > same > > but they use JavaScript :-) > > > > > > > > > > I'm wondering if someone has plans to do a good integration with Wicket > > > components, where instead of add components to AJAX targets, only > > > Javascript model objects would be changed and the controls would just > > > repaint themselves. > > > > > > > AjaxRequestTarget.appendJavaScript() ?! > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adriano > > > > > > > > >
