It seems to be integrated with JQuery quite easily (firing the ready() event on page replacements). Anyway it looks like a "smart" AjaxRequestTarget replacing the whole page (as you said through a WMC) and dealing with url changes using HTML5 history API. I don't know if this is a feature used in many applications though.
__ Cedric Gatay (@Cedric_Gatay <http://twitter.com/Cedric_Gatay>) http://code-troopers.com | http://www.bloggure.info | http://cedric.gatay.fr On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>wrote: > From its README file: > Compatibility > > Turbolinks is designed to work with any browser that fully supports > pushState and all the related APIs. This includes Safari 6.0+ (but not > Safari 5.1.x!), IE10, and latest Chromes and Firefoxes. > > Do note that existing JavaScript libraries may not all be compatible with > Turbolinks out of the box due to the change in instantiation cycle. You > might very well have to modify them to work with Turbolinks' new set of > events. > > > Is this really broadly used ?! > > > Can't you simulate it with a (Transparent)WebMarkupContainer that wraps all > the content in your page ? > > Wicket filters the loaded CSS/JS resources anyway. > > The only thing that's left is Browser Back button support. > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Cedric Gatay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > TurboLinks looks really cool, I think it could be a nice thing to have in > > Wicket for applications targeting recent web browsers. > > > > __ > > Cedric Gatay (@Cedric_Gatay <http://twitter.com/Cedric_Gatay>) > > http://code-troopers.com | http://www.bloggure.info | > > http://cedric.gatay.fr > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Has anyone thought (or even known about) the knockoutjs library? > > > > > > > > > > I'm impressed with it, and I'm integrating it with our application > > (that > > > > integration means less wicket usage). > > > > > > > > > > Some of the developers in Lift Web Framework were also impressed by it. > > Now > > > they are more impressed from AngularJs/EmberJs/youNameItJs. > > > Few years ago everyone wrote his own Java web framework, now it is the > > same > > > but they use JavaScript :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm wondering if someone has plans to do a good integration with > Wicket > > > > components, where instead of add components to AJAX targets, only > > > > Javascript model objects would be changed and the controls would just > > > > repaint themselves. > > > > > > > > > > AjaxRequestTarget.appendJavaScript() ?! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adriano > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
